Federal Judge Young Demanded to Indict Steny Hoyer

Contact: Jesha Miller FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE
1011 Lincoln Ave. Apt. D
Vanderburgh County
Evansville In. 47714
(812)- 604-4963

Federal Judge Richard Young Demanded to Indict & Arrest
Majority Leader Steny Hoyer

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer is part of a civil suit where Jesha Miller filed criminal charges as well as a Civil Suit. Congressman Hoyer was part of a Bipartisanship petitioned to obey the Constitutions checks & balances as intended by the Framers of the Constitution to prevent abuse of power. The petition using the Checks & Balances bring into question the integrity of the entire Judicial Branch of government having material evidence that the U.S. Supreme Court denied a Habeas Corpus to cover-up a Federal Crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 & deny Jesha Miller 10 million dollars for the illegal restraint. Because there is a crime involved defendants in the Civil Suit, case # 3:10-cv-051-RLY-WGH are charged with concealment of the crime & obstruction of justice, preventing the checks & balances so that officials are not held accountable for their actions.
Notable names involved are Majority & Minority Leaders of both the House & Senate who are Senator Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, & Congressman John Boehner. The media are also included for concealment of the crime & preventing the operation of the Constitutions checks & balances which include Katie Couric-CBS News, Tom Curley- CEO of the A.P., & Richard Davis- V.P. of News Standards for CNN. Civil Rights activist Al Sharpton is also a defendant concealing the crime & checks & balances that exposes government denying the 1st, 4th, 5th, Amendments, & the 14th Amendments right to due process. The crime is against the peace & dignity of the U.S. & is at war with Democracy because Slavery has been abolished by the 13th Amendment. The complaint is online at jeshamillervsgovnmedia.blogspot.com and all defendants were given legal warning of violating rights under color of law & refused to cease concealment of the crime & use of the Constitutions checks & balances making them liable to civil suit in addition to criminal charges.

Posted by Jesha Miller _______________________________
Date: May 4, 2010


Case 3:10-cv-00051-RLY-WGH 04/28/10 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

JESHA MILLER, )
)
Plaintiff, )
vs. ) 3:10-cv-051-RLY-WGH
)
ROBERT A. IGER, et al., ) Proceed to Prosecute

Plaintiff GRANTED TO PROCEED in forma pauperis does so
by demanding Court issue indictment and arrest for all
plaintiffs given legal warning denying rights under color of law.
Plaintiff's power is by the Constitutions checks & balances.


Plaintiff, Jesha Miller, demands the Court issue indictment and arrest of
all defendants given legal warning of denying rights under color of law. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 242; and 18 U.S.C. sec. 245 defendants are subject to criminal charges as well as civil & having given such warning defendants refused to cease concealment of the Federal Crime pursuant to
Title 18 sec. 243 committed by Judge David Kiely. The violation warning is part of the evidence submitted justifying the indictments and arrest of all defendants served such warning. The plaintiff demands indictment and arrest of Judge David Kiely of Vanderburgh County as Congress has made it a crime for a public official to exclude anyone from a grand or petit jury on the basis of race, 18 U.S.C. sec. 243, and the U.S. Supreme Court upheld
the statute, approving the congressional determination that such exclusion
prohibitions of the Equal Protection Clause. Ex parte Virginia, 100 U.S. 339
(1880). The crime, and the unconstitutional state action, occur whether the
defendant is white or Black, whether he is acquitted or convicted. In short a crime has occurred. The transcripts affirm the allegations to be factual, then the officials responsible for the jury selection acted in violation of the Constitution, denying potential Black jurors the equal opportunity to participate in the administration of justice. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303


( 1880 ). Moreover, if petitioner's allegations are true, the responsible officials
are subject to criminal penalties. 18 U.S.C. sec. 243. A closer look at the statute is warranted. Sec. 243 was intended to serve two purposes and the second is to prevent racial exclusions from juries by providing CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR PERSONS VIOLATING THE STATUTORY COMMAND. This includes prosecutor Maurer.

Aiding & abetting a criminal from justice in Criminal Law, contributing to or aiding in the commission of a crime, One who, without being present at the commission of an offense, becomes guilty of such an offense, not as a chief actor, but as a participant by concealment. Then U.S. Attorney Susan Brooks was petitioned to indict & arrest Judge David Kiely for the crime pursuant to Title 18 sec. 243 but refused her duty under part 2 of the statute to subject him to criminal penalties & concealed the crime. Corruption- the office is a position of trust where one receives authority in order to act on behalf of the public directly related to her duty.

An accessory is a person who assists in the commission of a crime, but who does not actually participate in the commission of the crime as a joint principal. Senators Richard Lugar, Evan Bayh, Harry Reid, & Mitch McConnell & Congressman Brad Ellsworth, Steny Hoyer, & John Boehner were petitioned to obey the Constitutions checks & balances by taking my petition using the checks & balances to the floor so that they would be addressed by Congress but aided & are accessories by concealment of the crime & checks & balances in obstruction of justice.

The media again aided & abetted by concealment of the crime & the petition using the checks & balances in obstruction of justice. In contempt of Constitutional Right # 925 which enables every citizen at any time to bring the government & any person in authority to the bar of public opinion by any just criticism upon their conduct in the exercise of authority which the people have conferred upon them. Having received violation warnings they refused to cease interference by exposing political corruption & the crime & chose to continue concealment sharing the criminal intent in denying my rights under color of law. As an accessory they all were given chance to withdraw from the crime by denouncing the plans, contacting the police, or giving coverage to no longer be an accessory, but refused to cease concealment. It is therefore demanded that all be indicted & arrested pursuant 18 U.S.C. sec. 242, 18 sec. 243, & 18 U.S.C. sec. 245, for criminal charges in addition to the Civil Suit.

ARTICLE 6, THE SUPREMACY LAW.
This means every state must obey the Constitution. It is the highest law of the nation. Every President, judge, member of Congress, as well as other government officials, must swear to obey the Constitution.

It is BY THIS POWER that I use the LAW in the SYSTEM OF CHECKS & BALANCES TO SUPER-CEDE ALL ELSE because here the whole Branch of government must be checked for abuse of power denying the guaranteed rights of the Bill of Rights which the Constitution does not allow. I THEREFORE DEMAND THAT ACTION BE TAKEN RIGHT NOW TO INDICT & ARREST THE DEFENDANTS HAVING ALREADY BEEN GIVEN LEGAL WARNING OF DENYING RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW AS THE CONSTITUTION STATES NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.
WHEN THE CHECKS & BALANCES ARE USED IT INCLUDES PEOPLE OF PROMINENT STATURE & OFFICIALS. THE INTEGRITY OF THE CONSTITUTION MUST BE UPHELD TO GIVE OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ANY CORRUPTION THAT TAKES PLACE IN THAT BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. IT IS BY THE CHECKS & BALANCES THAT THE INTEGRITY IS UPHELD & YOU HAVE TAKEN OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION SO INDICT & ARREST THOSE DEFENDANTS REFUSING TO CEASE CONCEALING THE CHECKS & BALANCES IN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. 18 USC SEC. 242, 243, 245.

II.

The plaintiff filed a "petition to change judge due to actual bias" and Judge RICHARD L. YOUNG, CHIEF JUDGE quoted 28 U.S.C. sec. 455(a), a federal judge must disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. This same case involving the checks & balances my case came before you when I was illegally imprisoned & you removed yourself at that time so why would you rule concerning this case.
If you removed yourself then, how can you remain now when it involves indicting & arresting Judge David Kiely in a time when you were Chief Judge of Vanderburgh County. Nonetheless, you now have the task of issuing indictments & arresting a former associate and worker which cast a dark light on this Branch of government because the crime is against the peace & dignity of the United States & is at war with Democracy because Slavery has been abolished & government violated the 14th Amendments due process. These rights cannot be merely promised & the checks & balances is what holds officials accountable when these violations denying the rights of the people occur.

The concealment of the checks & balances written into the Constitution to limit government power so that the natural rights of the people are protected is an act in defiance of the Constitution to continue corruption. Here the integrity of an entire Branch of government is at question having material evidence to be a factual petition with merit.
For these reasons I Demand this be your first priority because defendants can legitimately claim the government was corrupt at the time of their decision of which government refused to honor the Constitution themselves because they were corrupt. Upholding the integrity means there are no excuses releasing you from your obligation to enforce the law pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 242, 243, & 245 by indicting & arresting all defendants & because they hold offices you must inform the media so that the public is aware of political corruption. The Federal Crime & to deny 10 million dollars for the illegal restraint are the motive for the cover-up.

The indictments & arrest are to be sent with the civil suit as I previously demanded in this suit when filed. It is from the beginning that I informed the court that there are criminal charges as well as civil charges. I'm demanding that it take priority and requesting that the Court take no longer that three (3) days to serve the Complaint, indictments, & arrest. If they have not ceased concealment in seven ( 7 ) days, then the arrest are to take place immediately. This means they should be served by May 4th, 2010 & those refusing to cease concealment of the Constitutions checks & balances should be arrested by May 12, 2010.

4 pages.

Respectfully Submitted- Jesha Miller ____________________________
Date: April 29, 2010

CC: Raymond Hulser- Public Integrity Section
U.S. Dept. of Justice- Criminal Division
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.
Washington D.C. 20500